![]() |
|
|
(#1)
![]() |
||
Senior Member
Prepaid Specialist
Posts: 869
Join Date: 15 Oct 2004
Country:
![]() |
![]() Quote:
None of the fees you mentioned about e-kit are hidden...they are right there in the open. I believe the vast majority of North Americans will find that the majority of countries most (I agree not all) visit are listed in e=kit's zone 1 and hence those rates are quite competitive with most of the other international cards....now if I were going to Russia (BTW I need a visa to get there, I just can't go down to the airport and catch a plane to Moscow the same way I can to get to London or Tokyo) I would agree with you, e-kit is not a good choice. I would love you (or anybody else) to tell me of the best deal of a card that: 1. Has free reception of calls everywhere in the world (or at least less than say 20˘ US) 2. Dirt cheap calls both locally and internationally without surcharges to mobiles.. 3. Free sms everywhere 4. Low initial cost (after all, we've now seen in the last year how fragile so many of these companies are. If you were to have told me a year ago that both O9 and United Mobile would be reposing in peace today, I wouldn't have believed you). So you don't want to have to make a big initial investment just in case nor have minimum recharging prices. You can recharge e-kit for as little as $10 via the internetl 5. A US direct dial number (as rates to call US lines are relatively cheap throughout the world). 6. No fair usage policy (I don't use it for business like most tourists don't and have problem with asking somebody to call me back) 7. No annual fee.... When you come up with such a card, let us all know. But as for me, and I would say for most tourists who need an international card (if you're visiting one or two countries, in some cases you might be better off with a local sim) e-kit is not the worst choice in the world.....but I indeed respect your opinion. I just don't see why you have this hostility towards e-kit. They, at least to me who has read their stuff, quite up front with what they charge. |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|