PrePaidGSM.net Forum (Archived)


 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old
  (#10)
bbob (Offline)
Senior Member
Prepaid Expert
 
Posts: 499
Join Date: 20 Feb 2007

Country:
Default 26-07-2007, 14:12

Quote:
Originally Posted by prion View Post
You are right on your points. My point was only that UM is getting a good revenue from the increase of rates to call its network. Normally a carrier does not change the rate to a destination (at least not in such an extent) unless this is imposed by the destination
Now we seem to know more about the background of this investment. UM have new +44 numbers which kills my argument against the +423 numbers.

The +44 number will help them as it is more recognised and can be called easily at lower rates than the +423 numbers.
   
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 2002-2020 PrePaidGSM.net