View Single Post
Old
  (#16)
ChrisNeedsToKnow (Offline)
Member
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 81
Join Date: 22 May 2013

Country:
Default 23-06-2013, 17:29

Quote:
Originally Posted by tux View Post
I'd appreciate a similar proposal, but it would imply the change of ALL the existing telephone numbers.
Yes - but once done everything would become so much easier.

Also it might bring some sense back into numbering plans:

I´m originally from a town of 350.000 people (Bonn/Germany). When I learned what a phone is, numbers had 6 digits. That´s ~3 #s per individual.

Later this was increased to 7 digits. Granted - faxes and offices... Maybe 3 #s per person is a little tight, but 30 per person must be enough...

Nopes - new numbers were issued and now have 8 digits. That´s 100m #s (which could nearly accomodate all of China), or ~300 #s per individual. That´s just plain stoopid/unnecessary, or I´m getting above basic maths totally incorrect.

Last edited by ChrisNeedsToKnow; 23-06-2013 at 18:01..
   
Reply With Quote