Quote:
Originally Posted by petkow
If this is the case, they seem to be a sensible brand to switch to for calls initiated via the Java client. But I just want to confirm from somebody if this is really true? Is anybody actually using NohNoh?
|
I have been using nonoh.net since its inspection and it definitely does not charge the 5c connection fee ... almost. Keep in mind that nonoh.net has been introduced as a competitor to jajah.com, which explains its silly domain name. At that time, jajah.com did not charge the connection fee (I have no idea whether it still holds), so Betamax had to drop the 5c surcharge to tout its superiority.
My primary usage of nonoh.net callback feature is via a homebrew shell script which pretends to log-in into Web UI and then invokes a callback from there.
Why "almost"? I have noted in last couple of months that some of my calls have been billed with an additional fee of 3.9c (?). Those calls, however, were all involving an Italian mobile number. For example, a callback attempt where the first leg was that Italian mobile number, recipient answers, second leg rings but the call ends unanswered, has been charged 3.9c.
All landline-to-landline callback, on the other hand, have been billed
without a connection fee.