PrePaidGSM.net Forum (Archived) - View Single Post

bbob · 13-07-2007, 08:41

The only thing I read is that not skype is investing in UM but one of the investors that once invested in skype is now investing in UM.
The biggest problem for UM is their lichtenstein number. Calling lichtenstein is getting more and more of a problem and rates for calling lichtenstein numbers are getting more expensive day by day it seems.

I still have a UM number but hardly use it because of that reason. IOM seems to be a better alternative as you will get a normal +44 number.

I am wondering how this new investor will change the problem calling lichtenstein mobile at very high rates.

	(#4)
bbob (Offline) Senior Member Prepaid Expert Posts: 499 Join Date: 20 Feb 2007 Country:	13-07-2007, 08:41 The only thing I read is that not skype is investing in UM but one of the investors that once invested in skype is now investing in UM. The biggest problem for UM is their lichtenstein number. Calling lichtenstein is getting more and more of a problem and rates for calling lichtenstein numbers are getting more expensive day by day it seems. I still have a UM number but hardly use it because of that reason. IOM seems to be a better alternative as you will get a normal +44 number. I am wondering how this new investor will change the problem calling lichtenstein mobile at very high rates.