| Przemolog |
02-11-2007 11:55 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTuesday
(Post 18739)
Could even be the other way round - I assume MT collected the termination fees, then passed part of them on to Callkey (maybe there were delays/disputes/fraud allegations there).
|
OK with termination, but what about outgoing calls? Because callback was used, both "legs" are in fact outgoing calls from the operator to the both parties of the call. Since MT roaming agreements were in use, I suppose that Callkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTuesday
(Post 18739)
AFAIK Callkey just subcontracted a number range, didn't use MT switching etc, so there's really nothing for MT to replace it with.
|
It's not only about the number range. As I've mentioned above, Callkey used also MT roaming agreements what means some kind of switching, too (but I have no telecom education so may be wrong)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTuesday
(Post 18739)
And since MT is part of O2 who are part of Telefonica Spain they're not the sort of comany that would want to get involved with callback, or even miss the revenue (which they may have had very little of). Looks like the Manx sims are permanently dead.
|
Yes, I realise that MT is a part of much larger business nowadays. But, nevertheless, they have to care about the revenues on the island, not to count on "MT size" doesn't matter within the O2 group :D |
