PrePaidGSM.net Forum (Archived)

PrePaidGSM.net Forum (Archived) (https://prepaid.mondo3.com/forum/index.php)
-   International GSM prepaid cards (https://prepaid.mondo3.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Is UM the best for this... (https://prepaid.mondo3.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2345)

TheMadBrewer 12-07-2007 05:40

As for O9, rates to Iceland Mobile are in the .59 Euro range -- the sticky says there is a .25 Euro setup charge but I can't find mention of that on their website. That would make it way more expensive than UM.

0044 (IOM) is on the order of .55 Euro to a UK Mobile, similar to TravelSIM

So far, it looks like only UM has a special subscriber to subscriber rate.

As for the high termination rates for Lichtenstein, Iceland, Estonia, etc -- I don't view it as a conspiracy, but rather somebody has to pay for the free incoming calls (i.e. TANSTAAFL). I see people here bragging how they've had a UM (or other) SIMs for years and still have the original credit. How is UM (or others) to recoup their costs? When (if?) there is a EU wide agreement on roaming charges I think the need for these international SIMs will decrease (assuming its a good agreement). I do realize that they are used lots of places outside the EU but I would hazard that the EU (or EU + EFTA) is a big chunk of their business.

herkdrvr 13-07-2007 04:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by MATHA531 (Post 16023)
UM has never worked in New Zealand...if you look at the web site you will find New Zealand is more assuredly not listed as a country where it is supposed to work.

Yeah, I spoke without thinking. I've known it doesn't work in New Zealand 'cause they don't have an agreement with Vodafone.

andy 13-07-2007 17:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMadBrewer (Post 16036)
As for the high termination rates for Lichtenstein, Iceland, Estonia, etc -- I don't view it as a conspiracy, but rather somebody has to pay for the free incoming calls (i.e. TANSTAAFL). I see people here bragging how they've had a UM (or other) SIMs for years and still have the original credit. How is UM (or others) to recoup their costs?

They get a proportion of the incoming call fees, but I really don't think they are behind the increases in the tariffs to these numbers

prion 13-07-2007 17:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by andy (Post 16083)
They get a proportion of the incoming call fees, but I really don't think they are behind the increases in the tariffs to these numbers

The increase is obvious in the case of UM. Why do you say you do not think they are behind? Is it more rational that most carriers targeted UM for some reason and increased their rates?

MATHA531 13-07-2007 18:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by prion (Post 16086)
The increase is obvious in the case of UM. Why do you say you do not think they are behind? Is it more rational that most carriers targeted UM for some reason and increased their rates?

Frankly, I think that's one of the reasons. The existance of UM and the ability to make reasonably priced calls to it was an early stage in the fight against high roaming fees which was the bread and butter for many operators.

IMHO and in all due respect.

herkdrvr 14-07-2007 12:21

Cheap Calls to +423
 
Just a note, my wife calls me on my UM number via 3uTelecom. It's $.109 US and is oddly cheaper then calling to a Travelsim # ($.169). Much better then using the regular land line, and even cheaper then Vonage. Go figure.

prion 14-07-2007 12:49

Can someone subscribe to their service from outside US?

herkdrvr 14-07-2007 14:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by prion (Post 16091)
Can someone subscribe to their service from outside US?

I'm not sure, but you can probably ask them from their website, 3utelecom. I think you have to call a US Number and then input your number from there. Not sure if that would be any cheaper if you were outside the US. Good luck!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002-2020 PrePaidGSM.net